Michael
Faraday was a great scientist, perhaps one of the greatest to have lived. Albert Einstein, western culture’s epitome of
the great scientist, is said to have kept a picture of Faraday on his study
wall.
Faraday
was also a devout Christian – belonging to a small Christian sect known as the
Sandemanians.
Not
unlike the Christadelphians, the Sandemanians were a non-conformist sect who
sought to get back to what they took to be a simple understanding of bible
teaching. Like the CDs they had no paid
ministry, and capable male members undertook the officiating and teaching
duties. Faraday himself served as an
elder.
They
apparently took literally the biblical injunction to greet each other with “a
holy kiss”, and also followed Jesus’s pretty much universally ignored
commandment that his followers should “wash one another’s feet”.
They
originated in about 1760 in Scotland and spread though England and the USA in
the early 19th century. They gradually died out, first in America
and then in the UK, with the last London meeting house closing in 1984.
(For
those of you who are aware of Christadelphian history you may be interested to
know that according the Encyclopaedia Britannica, Alexander Campbell was
influenced by the Sandemanians, and you will remember who was influenced by Campbell!)
Why
did the Sandemanians die out?
They
were very strict and puritanical, and would not tolerate differences of
opinions. If anyone disagreed with the
opinions of the rest then they either had to recant and accept the opinion of
everyone else or be disfellowshipped. Even Faraday himself was suspended for
some obscure religious disagreement.
They
were very exclusive – refusing to join in prayer with other Christians outside
the sect and shunning anyone who have been disfellowshiped.
After
the initial growth they didn’t make many converts, relying on growth from within
the families in the sect (Faraday himself was born into the faith).
Perhaps
these are just some of the reasons why they didn’t thrive?
Can
we draw anything from the 250 year bell-curve cycle of existence of the
Sandemanians that might be relevant to the Christadelphians?
There
certainly are similarities in belief and practice, although perhaps the
Sandemanians were even stricter and more cut off from the real world than the
Christadelphians.
Could
the Christadelphians follow a similar 250 cycle? It all started 160 or so years ago and is
certainly in decline, so perhaps it could be said to be on the downward slope
of the same bell curve, which has only 90 or so years left before it reaches
the zero line.
In
the relatively prosperous western democracies there are not many converts. Young people who have been born into the
community are better informed about the alternatives and the reasons not to
believe, and many are just not joining up. Many older members, especially those who read
widely, and take an interest in what is being discussed in other religious
communities and in the scientific world, are losing faith that the community
has “the truth”. Many “lukewarm” members
stay in, because family commitments and the pain of change make it too
difficult to escape. Some of the bravest
and best leave.
What
is left is an ageing community, with the majority just going along with it
because that is what they have done since they were born, being led by a few fervent
believers, who try to bully the rest to “strengthen the things that remain”, in
the vain hope that their god actually cares more about the 0.00001% of the
world that they represent than he does about the other 99.99999% - (those
figure are real, not just rhetorical!)
But
without the drive and enthusiasm of a new movement, and with many of their
customs and practices anachronistically stuck in the 19th century,
and with Christianity itself being in decline there is not much hope of the
movement being re-invigorated,
Will
anything save the Christadelphians from becoming, like the Sandemanians, a mere
footnote in the history of the decline of Christianity?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please do not comment as 'Anonymous'. Rather, choose 'Name/URL' and use a fake name. The URL can be left blank. This makes it easier to see who is replying to whom.